🎧 Listen to this article (1:50)
I went into a shop to buy a chocolate bar. It was a wafer bar I’d bought before, in a wrapper I recognised, so I picked it up without thinking twice. Only when I got home did I notice the description: “chocolate flavour coating”.
The product description had changed, but my expectation hadn’t. I recognised the wrapper and assumed I knew what was inside. Nothing about its familiar appearance prompted me to look again.
When the recipe changes
The manufacturer had reduced cocoa mass and increased the proportion of vegetable fats. The coating still contained cocoa, but it no longer met the UK’s requirements to be called milk chocolate. That matters if you went in to buy milk chocolate.
Shrinkflation means getting less of the same product. Skimpflation means changing the ingredients, often to reduce costs. A smaller bar is still the same bar, only less of it. Here, the coating itself had changed.
The manufacturer has reasonable arguments. Cocoa prices rose sharply, and the maker says it sensory-tested the revised recipe. The updated description is printed on the wrapper.
But tasting similar doesn’t make two products identical. I might enjoy a chocolate-flavoured wafer and still prefer one coated in milk chocolate. That’s my choice to make, but I can only make it if I know what’s changed.
The difference between labelling and transparency
Ronseal built its reputation on “Does exactly what it says on the tin.” The irony is that this wafer also says what it is, if you look closely.
The familiar wrapper may be telling your memory a different story.
A prominent “New recipe” notice would have given regular customers a reason to look again. The change would have been easier to recognise before paying, not after.
Had I noticed those words in the shop, I would have put the bar back. Next time, I’ll read the wrapper before I pay.
